LAS VEGAS
Contenders lobby. It is part of the job, and usually it happens through managers, quietly. Alex Pereira has taken his case public instead. In an interview with Brazilian journalist Laerte Viana, reported Tuesday by BJPenn.com, Pereira questioned the UFC's decision to book Ciryl Gane against Josh Hokit for the heavyweight championship at UFC 334 in New York — a title fight Pereira believes should have been his rematch.
According to BJPenn.com, Pereira said he spoke directly with UFC executive Hunter Campbell and was told Gane-Hokit would be the fight. Pereira said that when he released a video on his own channel, he was still expecting the promotion to book him against Gane. The explanation he says he was given afterwards was that the organization had run some kind of poll or vote and that the public wanted Gane-Hokit. His response, in BJPenn.com's account, was blunt: he never saw such a poll, and he does not believe the demand materialized on its own.
'It's All Kind of Manipulated'
The strongest part of Pereira's complaint is not the booking itself — it is how he says the booking was sold. Per BJPenn.com, Pereira argued that voices with large platforms, including commentator Daniel Cormier, were talking up Gane-Hokit as a good fight before it was announced, in a way he believes was designed to make the public accept it by the time it dropped. Bloody Elbow, covering the same Viana interview, framed it the same way: Pereira accusing the promotion of using influential voices to push an agenda. MiddleEasy's report on the interview likewise led with Pereira's claim that the UFC and Cormier helped shape public opinion ahead of the announcement, and Sportskeeda carried the same remarks under Pereira's own summary of the situation — that the push was, in his words, manipulated.
Previously is not in a position to verify whether any poll existed or whether any commentator was briefed, and Pereira's account is his account — an interested party making a public case. But the UFC has not, in any of the reports cited here, produced the poll Pereira says he never saw. That gap between explanation and evidence is exactly the space a star contender's frustration grows in, and Pereira is using it.

Why Pereira Feels Owed a Rematch
Context explains the temperature. Per BJPenn.com and Sportskeeda, Pereira lost to Gane at UFC Freedom 250, and he has been vocal ever since about how that fight unfolded — Sportskeeda reports Pereira's position that illegal strikes were part of the story of his defeat. A contender who believes his loss came with an asterisk does not hear 'wait your turn' the way a cleanly beaten contender does. In Pereira's framing, he was not passed over in a queue; a wrong was left uncorrected and then repackaged as a fan preference.
There is also the simple mathematics of stardom. Pereira's profile in this sport is that of a two-division UFC champion who has headlined some of the promotion's biggest nights — a draw whose title fights sell themselves. Hokit, whatever his upside, does not bring that commercial gravity to a heavyweight title fight in New York. When a promotion chooses the lesser-known challenger over the superstar asking for a rematch, it owes somebody an explanation, and 'the fans voted for it' is an explanation that invites precisely the scrutiny Pereira is now applying to it in public.
What This Says About the Heavyweight Picture
Step back and the division looks unsettled in a way this dispute exposes. The champion, Gane, defends against a challenger in Hokit whose title shot a former two-division champion is openly calling manufactured. The biggest name in the division is booked one card later, at UFC 335, in a fight he plainly regards as a consolation. And the promotion's matchmaking rationale, as reported, rests on a fan vote nobody quoted in these reports has actually produced. None of that means Gane-Hokit will be a bad fight — Hokit gets his shot either way, and winning settles arguments faster than polling does. It does mean the belt's next chapter starts under a cloud the UFC created for itself.

What Pereira Needs Against Pavlovich
For all the politics, Pereira's route back is brutally simple, and it runs through Sergei Pavlovich at UFC 335. Per BJPenn.com and Bloody Elbow, a heavyweight title shot is in play in that matchup — the winner positions himself to challenge whoever leaves UFC 334 with the belt. Pavlovich is among the most dangerous one-punch heavyweights in the sport, which makes this less a waiting-room fight than a second elimination bout Pereira never asked for.
Win, and Pereira's public campaign becomes leverage: a star coming off a Pavlovich victory, still arguing his Gane loss deserves a direct correction, is very hard to keep out of a title fight. Lose, and the lobbying reads in hindsight like a man arguing with a door that was already closed. That is why these comments matter beyond the headline. Pereira is not just complaining about UFC 334 — he is building the public record for the fight he intends to demand after UFC 335, and making sure that if the promotion goes elsewhere again, it will have to explain itself twice.
Follow the heavyweight picture on our Sports front and the fighters index, and read Pereira's full case on his fighter page.
Sources · 4 sources
- BJPenn.com — Alex Pereira questions UFC's booking of Ciryl Gane vs Josh Hokit, October 13, 2026
- Bloody Elbow — Pereira calls out Daniel Cormier and UFC over Gane vs Hokit, October 12, 2026
- MiddleEasy — Pereira accuses UFC, Daniel Cormier of manipulating public opinion ahead of Gane-Hokit, October 2026
- Sportskeeda — Pereira accuses Daniel Cormier and UFC of pushing agenda on Gane-Hokit fight, October 2026






